Eu4 ideal army composition.

When playing Russia, I'm getting completely hamstrung economically by filling Artillery with "standard" army compositions to the point where I'm only able to fill roughly half of my force limit. I'm going Trade and Econ as my first and third ideas and focusing on developing my economy but am in the severe red anytime I have to reinforce a few ...

Eu4 ideal army composition. Things To Know About Eu4 ideal army composition.

Almost always I keep a 3-1-2 composition until mod-game, when I switch to a 5-2-3 composition, then in late-game to a 5-1-3 with bigger overall stacks. Originally posted by Psychotic Fury: Originally posted by ChaosTLW: Max is 90, actually, but eh.The best (heavy supply) is LC, HI and Elephants in the center. edited. If you have more soldiers (like 10k vs 5k, not enough to fill out combat width) filling your flanks with horse archers will win you a lot of battles. Always look at your nation's military traditions.A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. Members Online Am I the only one annoyed by the fact that level 2 and 3 advisors could cost as much as an entire army's maintenanceQuick rundown on the battle composition change in 1.33-----EU4 on Steam : https://store.steampowered.com/app/236850/Europa_Universalis_IV/EU4 ...16/4/20. If I'm not mistaken, the optimal army composition consists of your combat width full of artillery, 40% of the width of cavalry and then 60% multiplied by 1.5 the width of infantry. So basically, if your combat width is 20, you should have 20 artillery, 8 cavalry and 18 infantry. 6:4 cav/artillery for Polish horde.

100% cavalry, only engage on flat terrain. I'm not a Tengri horde. Have around 65% cavalry if 75% is your limit, because if you lose some infantry in battle and therefore get over 75% cav ratio you'll get a malus on them. As said only fight on flat terrain like grassland, steppes, dessert etc for the shock bonus.What would be the most efficient and powerful composition of inf/cav/art. Also how does artillery affect siege? ... Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by lescribanot90. Ideal Army Compositions? What would be the most efficient and powerful composition of inf/cav/art. Also how does artillery affect siege? I understand that having just 1 artillery unit gives a ...

If memory serves right, in 1650 your combat width should be around 32. So a good army composition might be 32 front row infantry + 8 spare units = 40 infantry and 21 artillery to get the maximum siege bonus on a star fort capital (level 6 + 1). You can go all the way up to 32 artillery, if you can afford that.

Also, the "ideal" army has full combat-width cannons as soon as they are invented. Sure, they do crap damage until around mil16, but any damage is more than 0 when we're talking about the ideal composition. Also, artillery don't "outdamage" infantry until mil25 from the backrow, but that obviously shouldn't stop you from having a full backrow ...Use numbers like 24, when you split your army its 5-2-5 which is some nice small regiments. When a huge battle is going combining them would make 20-8-20 which most of the time would be accurate as combat width.Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by papapyro. Why does the ideal army composition guide say to not use artillery til tech 16? This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A jeterb98 • Additional comment actions. I get artillery in my armies as soon as its available but only ...Animals and Pets Anime Art Cars and Motor Vehicles Crafts and DIY Culture, Race, and Ethnicity Ethics and Philosophy Fashion Food and Drink History Hobbies Law Learning and Education Military Movies Music Place Podcasts and Streamers Politics Programming Reading, Writing, and Literature Religion and Spirituality Science Tabletop Games ...What would be the most efficient and powerful composition of inf/cav/art. Also how does artillery affect siege? I understand that having just 1 artillery unit gives a +1 to the siege but after that i don't understand how much i need for +2 and beyond.

It's very good and informative but I have one major problem with it (I'm sure I just don't get something and it's no problem with the spreadsheet). At mil tech 16 it says ideal army composition consist of 66 units (32/4/30). Say what? My best provinces can support 41 units at best (in my current Bohemia game for example) at this point of the game.

A 10% horses under the limit. With sunni hordes the limit is like 80, so 70% cav. At tech 13, have full combat width of backrow cannons, at tech 16 all inf and cannons only. 10% inf - rest cav. Or go pro mode. Hire 100% cav and merch inf, inf 4 inf, and then you go beat up ming with your 16 cav, 4 inf army. Cavalry.

Ideal army composition in 2023? ... Some franchises and games of note: Stellaris, Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities: Skylines. Members Online. Mockup Political Map of Anataloia from Tinto Talks #4This is the correct answer. While horde cav is less inefficient than other cav in terms of power for money, you're still better off using infantry - especially since the hordes usually do not have a great economic situation for most of the game.However, if you want to optimize for combat strength, optimal army composition is always, i.e. from the start of the game, a full back row of artillery, as much cavalry as your ratio can afford and the rest infantry, obviously modified to account for any casualties. Before tech 13/16, however, such a composition is grossly cost-ineffective.Hey y'all, so I'm ampere per new to EU4, only have about a hundred hours, and the thing that confuses me the highest is army composition. Method many info do I...Almost always I keep a 3-1-2 composition until mod-game, when I switch to a 5-2-3 composition, then in late-game to a 5-1-3 with bigger overall stacks. Originally posted by Psychotic Fury: Originally posted by ChaosTLW: Max is 90, actually, but eh.

Overall, as long as the first army isn't crushed, you should be fine. And now that I've thought about it, going 12/8/10 or 10/10/10 should be fine for the PLC, simply because they can do so without incurring the insufficient support modifier as easily as a western nation might. With the PLC, (especially a Polish-led PLC) cavalry can reach up to ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by PathToTheDawn Map Staring Expert Economy Planning/Army Composition 1.30.2 . Hello all, I am a bit of a beginner with only about 1300 hours of map staring. I've seen Reman's army comp series on YouTube, so I do my best to fill my combat width with 4 cavalry and as many infantry as my tech allows, then fill the back row ...Less short answer: To optimize your army composition get as many infantry and cavalry to fill your front line first, around 4 cav is fine, this number increases with greater flanking range. Get lots of cannons starting from tech 16, at the very least 1/3 of your army, closer to 1/2 your army.A national modifier (like a government or idea slot) is a scope that can hold any number of modifiers. The only reason for the limitation is UI. Hahaha it costs points for no benefit save flavor. I think it gives a (very minor) benefit, in that female rulers and heirs would be able to be made into generals.We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.

I'd describe my EU experience level the same way you do yours, so/but grain of salt: I find I'm not good enough to enjoy the endless 1.5 nations vs 3 nations wars that my playstyle apparently causes on very hard. It's the arbitrary difficulty opinion malus that seems to result in the ai focusing to lock me out diplomatically from expanding, as soon as it can.

What is the best army composition for mid-late game as a Horde? ... -33% Horde idea -20% Loyal/Influential Tribes Estate. -10% Trading in Livestock -5% Trading in Iron -10% Oirat idea Your 0/1/1 now hits harder while costing far less than 1/0/1 ... r/eu4 • Top amount of mana generated by a ruler is 6/6/6, a gold mine with optimal development ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... I'm playing a relaxed colonial Portugal run, and was wondering what the ideal army size for garrisoning colonies in the Americas is? Same for African colonies? Thanks in advance. This thread is archived ... r/eu4 • Quick and dirty army composition: I/C/A = width/4/width (incl which unit type to pick) ...Regardless the exact numbers of the army composition, keep in mind that you should keep smaller separate stacks nearby in order to avoid attrition, since the ideal army composition usually requires more troops than the supply limit in most of the provinces. 4. PlatipusBest.There is no 'ideal' composition. There are good ones. Start with a general, always make sure you have a general. Make your army big. Bigger armies are less likely to be engaged and less likely to lose. Start with infantry. Up to full combat width or force limit, whichever comes first. When cannons come along get at least 5, 6 is better and 10 ...Sometimes my armies retreat to the end of the world, sometimes just one province. I was just fighting France as the Netherlands, they won one battle, my army falls back one province (we were on my lands, so it's not like we were on foreign territory and couldnt retreat far), then gets stuck because of no morale, and then France moves and wipes ...So I am playing as Prussia and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions on army composition to win more battles (currently running 5 armies of 5 infantry 1 cavalry and 2 cannons and then one main siege force that is 11 3 and 7) I am inclined to add more infantry to the mix due to my infantry combat ability from prussian traditions and quality ideas.Hey, i hope all of you guys are doing alright! I have been thinking that if there was a tool for eu4 where you can select your country and military tech level and it pops up the approximate ideal army composition, that would be great. I'm sorry if there is already a tool like this but sometimes i lose very easy battles or just barely able to ...Almost always I keep a 3-1-2 composition until mod-game, when I switch to a 5-2-3 composition, then in late-game to a 5-1-3 with bigger overall stacks. Originally posted by Psychotic Fury: Originally posted by ChaosTLW: Max is 90, actually, but eh.I was wondering if I could transfer this idea, which in the berber traditions text file is called "may_perform_slave_raid = yes". I tried adding this to a file in "Steam\steamapps\common\Europa Universalis IV\common\custom_ideas" the file is called "01_new_ideas" and I tried to create my own however it just said that the idea did nothing when I ...

I think EU4 does a pretty good job of showing how army sizes dramatically increased as the centuries went on; a late medieval battle between European countries (e.g. England and France) usually wouldn't have much more than 20,000 - 30,000 men on each side, whereas from the 17th century onwards the sizes of the armies increased as feudalism disappeared and stronger, more centralised States ...

the starting horde cavalry has unrivaled pips, and before tech 5 there is not supply for more then a few units per province, but quantity > quality after that, and infantry is just 1/3 upkeep, translating to 3x bigger army for the same buck

Then it is recommended to have the following army composition: Full first row of Infantry / Cavalry (30 units with mil tech 16) Second row with as much Artillery as you can afford. Basically in the late game, when your combat width is at 40, you should have the following army composition: 40k infantry + 40k artillery.Army Composition . Question Hello, what is the ideal army compositions throughout EU4? I am playing as Byzantium and am fighting against Spain and completely losing battles despite only being 1 tech behind and having more troops. I am running 20 infantry 4 cav and 16 artillery at mil tech 15.Qing army composition (non horde) I can't seem to find any good info on what army composition to use for a non horde qing. I formed it from Korea so I only have 50% cavalry to infantry ratio and I've never played an eastern nation with cab bonuses before so I'd like any advice. Assuming you took qing ideas it should be whatever cav you ...Hey guys, hope you enjoy this combat guide that will hopefully introduce you to the basics of combat in EU4! As always, this guide is written with some bias,...As prussia you shouldn't have trouble with numbers as your discipline and french-like morale should also help out alongside combat ability, late game army comps should usually have 1 arty per infantry because arty attacks from the back line dealing decent damage while taking no damage so long as infantry in the front soak it up, in other words try to keep an equal amount of arty-infantry or ... Infantry+cavalry = combat width x 1.5 Artillery = combat width. Your infantry:cavalry ratio might vary by nation, but basically I use Cavalry = Mil Tech / 2. Such that at 16 tech I have 8 cavalry in an attack. And the rest infantry. The new reinforcement rules, change some support tactics, but I just break an army into 3 parts for manuevers to ... My ideal March is a nation with good military NI, with decent but not enormous base tax. I tend to use Marches as a buffer state between large areas of the map. In my Ottoman game, I wanted to mostly ignore Europe and fight in the Levant and India. ... r/eu4 • Quick and dirty army composition: I/C/A = width/4/width (incl which unit type to pick)2)+0.2 military tactics is huge, it provides a flat modifier to damage taken so you are taking 13.3% more losses from military tactics alone. 3) You have a -1 to all rolls from a terrain penalty. 4) Your leader is 2/1/2/0, Spains is 6/4/1/1 so they are a net 4/3/-1/1 better.If you ever go for Aristocratic first idea in the first war against Ming if you're not confident or have scored trading in livestock via deving the shit out of your stated provinces or conquest, cavalry becomes better. And the higher your shock pip vs the enemy, the bigger advantage you'd get from cavalry.As a Tengri Horde, you want to stick with no-Syncretic Tengri for 100% Cavalry ratio and dirt cheap 5 ducat cavalry after stacking it with loyal/influential Tribes estate, Horde idea, and Oirat NI/Trading in Livestock.Age of Wonders 4Empire of SinCities: Skylines 2Crusader Kings 3Europa Universalis 4Hearts of Iron 4Hunter: The ReckoningImperator: RomeMillenniaPrison ArchitectStellarisSurviving MarsSurviving the AftermathWerewolf: the ApocalypseVampire: The MasqueradeVictoria 3. Legacy Wikis. AoW: PlanetfallCities: SkylinesCrusader Kings 2Arsenal of ...

Not as a horde with 100% cav ratio. Full front line of banner cav with a full line of cannons in the back will stackwipe almost anything or atleast deal tremendous damage to the enemy. Manpower is no problem for banner units so just make sure to get a decent economy. No. Cav remain better than inf throughout the game.Honestly unless you’re a horde, your army won’t be super different in composition from a standard army even with the cav bonuses. For a normal army you should have 4 cav in a full fighting stack. for Poland it should be more, so from 6 to 10. Don't go to the cav/inf ratio, because infantry dies more and you will have the tactics penalty.cavalry is better than inf, but is generally considered to be more expensive than they're worth, so you only really want 2-4 per army, unless you have crazy cav ability. so if you had 40 combat width, I use an army with 38/2/40 to fill both rows. with some infantry reinforcements nearby to plug the gaps as the front line dies in battle, to ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Which means that the best army composition is achieved through sheer amount of money because it's so expensive to have 20+ artillery in the early to mid game. Regarding your question, half cav seems a bit much if you are playing a western nation after the first 80 or so years. It's probably good if you are Poland ...Instagram:https://instagram. calhoun state prison gageorgy kavkaz where is he fromwaterford memorial day paradedo caribou points expire When it reaches +50% use 6. At +100% use 8. As for the cavalry ratio it just looks at the number of soldiers in a stack and how many are cavalry. 18inf 6cav would be 6/24=25%. Aiming for the cav ratio is pointless because cav is not all that good to begin with, except for their unique ability to flank. Reply reply. ascend amphitheater seatingis tati amare still on live in the d Combat width is the limiter here, and I believe the flanking bonus is worth it to have at least 4 horsemen (I run 6 in case one or two get wiped in a battle). The rest is infantry and artillery. 3. I know the the optimal army compositions for normal Western countries, but my question is should it be different for the Prussians? Would an army….MrCard-Gaming. •. Depends on what you want to do. You are in a decent position for almost anything: Protestant HRE, HRE dismantle, Semi tall with Lubeck, Very wide with religious into Russia, Colonial, wtv anything can work with Sweden since you have good ideas and events, good position and lack of missions to steer you one way. For military ... casting crowns albertville al Roughly meaning you could see a horde army beat a western army 2-3 times its size. As western army as you can see has the same 3 pips on its cavalry and infantry at levels 5-8 and only half the army can be cavalry. In theory a 50/50 infantry/cavalry army would be the best choice. However it's much more expensive and not all that more effective.Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Genral rule: Army composition depends on what modificators you go for, but for the basic normal army you have 2 cav and fill up the rest of your combat width with infantry. You have as much artillery as you can pay for with these basics. This changes of course if you play a cav heavy nation like poland or the hordes ...